MYP Drama Companion
Grades 9 and 10 · PCUP MYP Drama Companion

Criterion D · Task 4 · max 8 each strand

Evaluating

Two strands. Strand i evaluates your own performance. Strand ii reflects on your development as an artist. Both must be anchored to the video with timestamps. If the examiner cannot see it, it does not exist. Structure every point with PEEL or with the what, how, why framework, whichever you prefer.

From the criteria
Your written response must refer directly to your performance video using timestamps. The examiner will watch your video alongside your written work.
Criterion D, examiner note

What you submit

One PDF of 1,000 to 1,200 words across 4 pages. One introductory paragraph, three main body sections and a conclusion. Structure every point with PEEL or the what, how, why framework, whichever you prefer, and use it consistently. Both do the same job: name it, show it, say why it worked and the impact it had on the audience.

D·i

Evaluating your own work: judgements, not description

Examiner looks for

At 5 to 6 you must evaluate, not just analyse. At 7 to 8 the evaluation is nuanced: it identifies what could be improved and explains why that would work. The student who only writes about what worked is sitting at 5 to 6.

Step by step
  1. Write 3 to 4 points on the performance, each anchored to a timestamp the examiner can watch.
  2. Cover production as well as performance. Blend them into one paragraph or write separate paragraphs, but both must be covered.
  3. Use a range of techniques, not all about direct address or all about gestus.
  4. Include at least one point on what could have been stronger in your own performance, and explain why that change would have worked.
From the exemplar
D·i · step 1Direct address at 4:57
“In this moment you can see me at the down stage center on the floor as I begin to speak in Hindi. This is spoken in a distressed manner as a plea directly to the audience; the use of Hindi in this moment means that many of them will not understand, forcing them to disengage to think of the possible translation.”
D·i · step 4What could have been stronger
“However, I believe the direct address could have been further emphasized by me actually going up to the audience, one person at a time, and begging, in Hindi, for them to help me or at least understand me. This would have placed audience members in an extremely uncomfortable position.”
7 to 8 · Thoroughly and perceptively evaluates

Nuanced judgements with depth and insight, identifying improvements and explaining why they would work.

D·ii

You as an artist: growth, setbacks and what you learned

Examiner looks for

A balanced, reflective consideration of several aspects: growth, setbacks, learning and collaboration. This section is about you, not the performance. Honesty is what lifts it: a thoughtful response to three questions beats a shallow pass at four.

Step by step
  1. Write 3 to 4 points on your artistic development: collaboration, refining work, recognising what was not working, taking creative risks.
  2. Name a challenge you met and how you overcame it, focused on meeting the SOI or working within your style.
  3. Add 2 to 3 points of critical reflection: peer feedback you applied, what you would do differently, what you learned about theatre’s power.
  4. Pick three and go deep rather than skimming everything.
From the exemplar
D·ii · step 1Naming your own weakness
“Personally, I believed I was doing a reasonable job with my over the top physicality but I was informed by my classmates that was not the case; I was apparently too one dimensional. After taking some time to look back on rehearsal videos I noticed that there were key moments where I seemed to slack off.”
D·ii · step 2A challenge, diagnosed and solved
“We simply were not giving the audience enough time to really think about what we were trying to convey. So after taking some time to deliberate as a group, we pinpointed key moments in our performance where we would slow down or add alienation.”
7 to 8 · Discusses

Balanced and reflective across growth, setbacks, learning and collaboration, with the setbacks given as much weight as the growth.

Mark bands, strand i, your own work

1 to 2DescribesSays what happened. No justification.
3 to 4AnalysesBreaks down how it worked. Names techniques, explains effects.
5 to 6EvaluatesJudges effectiveness with reasoning. Names what worked and what did not.
7 to 8Thoroughly and perceptively evaluatesNuanced judgements with depth and insight. Identifies improvements and explains why they would work.

Mark bands, strand ii, development as an artist

1 to 2OutlinesStates that growth happened.
3 to 4DescribesDescribes growth, what was learned.
5 to 6AnalysesBreaks down growth, what changed and why.
7 to 8DiscussesBalanced, reflective consideration of multiple aspects: growth, setbacks, learning, collaboration.

One claim about direct address, at four levels

Band 1 to 2Describes

“We used direct address in our performance.”

Says it happened. No timestamp. No effect. No SOI.

Band 3 to 4Analyses

“The direct address broke the fourth wall, which created a Verfremdungseffekt.”

Technique named, effect named. But no timestamp, no judgement of effectiveness, no SOI link.

Band 5 to 6Evaluates

“At (2:30) the direct address was effective because it forced the audience to confront cultural bias rather than passively watching.”

Anchored to a timestamp, evaluative claim made. But it is one sided. Only what worked, no nuance.

Band 7 to 8Thoroughly evaluates

“A second performance technique I utilised to demonstrate the damaging effects of beauty standards was direct address as seen at 4:57. In this moment you can see me at the down stage center on the floor as I begin to speak in Hindi. The translation of my dialogue in the scene is “this is my tradition; this is my identity”. This is spoken in a distressed manner as a plea directly to the audience; the use of Hindi in this moment means that many of them will not understand – forcing them to disengage to think of the possible translation. Meanwhile, besides me, another actor grabs a placecard which contains a mistranslated version of my dialogue and presents it to the audience. The contradiction between my Hindi and the placecard exposes how detrimental miscommunication can be especially against individuals from marginalized communities who are often spoken over, mistreated and hidden behind harmful stereotypes. This forces the audience to face the reality that often society forces people t”

From the 2026 exemplar. Timestamped, the technique named, the impact on the audience explained, and it goes on to name what could have been stronger and why that would have worked.

Loss list

What prevents you getting top band at Criterion D

Self check before you submit

Strand i and strand ii. Criterion D readiness.

Real student work · grade 7 · 2026

See it in real work

This is the 2026 exemplar’s Criterion D: the evaluation of the performance and the reflection on growth as an artist. The gold notes in the margin are the examiner lens: what each move does and why it earned the marks. Read it for how it is written, not to borrow the content.

Evaluating the performance + development as an artist Task 4, Evaluating (Criterion D)

D.1Opening, intention restated

Although our performance was initially 10 minutes long, I decided to present only 5 minutes of my most powerful individual performance that contained the best display of my acting ability according to the epic theater criterion while also demonstrating our artistic intention: beauty standards negatively adjust the relationships between women and their bodies. Our performance links to the statement of inquiry, beauty and uniqueness are found in our differences, as it explored the theme of imposed societal beauty standards forcing the audience to question if women erasing the differences truly makes them beautiful.

Band 7 move · Editorial choice made transparent

The candidate names that they cut a 10 minute piece to 5 minutes for the submission AND names the reason. Transparency about editorial decisions is itself a form of reflection.

D.2PEEL, alienation effect via multirolling (advertiser scene)

One of the key performance techniques I employed was the alienation effect via multirolling. This can be seen at 0:03. In this moment I make use of an over exaggerated physicality with outstretched arms, legs wide apart, sharp movements and the illusion of me holding some form of bottle. Additionally, the use of overdone and dramatised facial expressions highlighted by the widened eyes to convey horror regarding the princess’s skin, was an attempt to alter Snow White’s perception of herself negatively. Between my over exaggerated physicality and the Princess’s passive body language, a clear contradiction in power dynamic is shown between the power of companies, who spend millions of dollars researching ways to undermine girls’ confidences to sell them products, and the consumers also known as the girls themselves.

Another clear contradiction in body language is shown at 0:15 when I successfully convince my customer to buy my product. I multiroll from an advertiser to a de individualised figure in a neutral position eliminating the over exaggerated physicality while also removing all aspects of identity. The sharp transition of this moment is a use of the alienation effect which highlights the performative, artificial and programmed nature of companies and advertisers who exploit young girls by manufacturing an insecurity for them. By exposing the robotic, repetitive nature of advertisements, the audience is advised to contemplate how companies frame interactions between themselves and consumers as a personal exchange.

Band 7 move · P E-E L visible

P: alienation via multirolling. E: (0:03) + specific physicality (outstretched arms, legs wide apart, widened eyes). E: WHY, exposes the artificial nature of advertising. L: SOI cash out, companies erase identity to sell back insecurity.

Band 7 move · Two timestamps comparing before/after

(0:03) advertiser mode vs (0:15) neutral mode. The candidate compares two moments to show the V effekt landing, exactly the band 7 evaluation move.

Band 7 move · Audience demand named

“the audience is advised to contemplate how companies frame interactions… as a personal exchange”, the audience is told what they are being asked to do. Interpretive demand made explicit.

D.3PEEL, direct address in Hindi (what could be stronger)

A second performance technique I utilised to demonstrate the damaging effects of beauty standards was direct address as seen at 4:57. In this moment you can see me at the down stage center on the floor as I begin to speak in Hindi. The translation of my dialogue in the scene is “this is my tradition; this is my identity”. This is spoken in a distressed manner as a plea directly to the audience; the use of Hindi in this moment means that many of them will not understand, forcing them to disengage to think of the possible translation. Meanwhile, besides me, another actor grabs a placecard which contains a mistranslated version of my dialogue and presents it to the audience. The contradiction between my Hindi and the placecard exposes how detrimental miscommunication can be especially against individuals from marginalized communities who are often spoken over, mistreated and hidden behind harmful stereotypes.

However, I believe the direct address could have been further emphasized by me actually going up to the audience, one person at a time, and begging, in Hindi, for them to help me or at least understand me. This would have placed audience members in an extremely uncomfortable position. It requires them to recognise they too are part of the problem because they are simply sitting down and letting the other actors disrespect me, this will encourage them to further think about their own biases.

Band 7 move · Bilingual direct address as Brechtian device

Speaking in Hindi while a mistranslating placecard is held up is a brilliant V effekt construction, language itself is alienated. The candidate names exactly what the contradiction exposes (miscommunication against marginalised communities).

Band 7 move · The required “could have been stronger” move

The Crit D guide specifically asks for at least one evaluation of what could have been stronger in your own performance, here the candidate names a concrete improvement (one on one direct address in Hindi) and explains why it would have worked (audience implicated in the disrespect).

Band 7 move · Honesty as evaluation

“they are simply sitting down and letting the other actors disrespect me”, the candidate is willing to implicate the audience in their own theatre.

D.4PEEL, projections (production element)

A production element that I made use of was projections as seen at 1:10. Behind us actors is a large projection with a pink cake, a happy birthday title, sprinkles and colour. I chose to make this projection pink, specifically because pink is a colour that stereotypically is considered to represent femininity. It is known to represent love, affection, beauty and care but by also integrating it as a representation of lust, it frames the fetishization and objectification of femininity.

This scene specifically talks about weight insecurities which the projection aims to emphasize as seen at 2:21, when the actor faints. At this moment the projection changes with hazard tape covering it. In the center there is a pulsing danger sign that states “calories exceeded”. The alienation effect was used here as the soft, celebratory tone is immediately interrupted by a jarring warning sign. The emotional moment between the actor and the audience is interrupted as they are forced to take a step back and acknowledge the change. When we first used it in front of an audience, we observed their eyes widening and their body stiffening; later they informed us that the projection was unexpected and alarming which we counted as a success.

Band 7 move · Production element with full PEEL

The Crit D guide asks for at least one paragraph on production (not performance). The candidate evaluates projections with timestamps (1:10 and 2:21), specific design choices (pink → fetishization, hazard tape → “calories exceeded”), and audience reception (eyes widening, body stiffening).

Band 7 move · Colour theory as analytical move

The pink choice is justified through stereotype theory (femininity → love/care, recoded as fetishization). Colour is read as Brechtian argument, not aesthetic decoration.

Band 7 move · Audience reception as evidence

“we observed their eyes widening and their body stiffening; later they informed us that the projection was unexpected”, observed audience reaction + reported audience reaction. Two forms of evidence for one claim about effectiveness.

D.5Development, creative risk taking

A key skill I developed during the creation of my performance was creative risk taking. A fundamental part of epic theater is the exaggerated physicality but throughout rehearsals this was something my group really struggled on. Personally, I believed I was doing a reasonable job with my over the top physicality but I was informed by my classmates that was not the case; I was apparently too one dimensional. This feedback was initially discouraging, especially since every time I thought I was really putting effort into my body language, the audience clearly did not feel the same way.

After taking some time to look back on rehearsal videos I noticed that there were key moments where I seemed to slack off and almost forget about my body language because I was too focused on a separate part of the production. After experimenting with my body language, I discovered that the easiest ways to use angular movement were through my arms, upper body and neck while also keeping my legs far apart. In my next rehearsal with my group, I made a conscious effort to focus on my exaggerated physical language and really step out of my comfort zone. I got a lot more positive feedback which was motivating, however I was also informed that my audience was unable to detect any physical contrasts between myself and other characters, especially when I multirolled. Consequently, I specifically zeroed in on the slight difference in my physicality that would help audience members distinguish between the advertiser, photographer, princess or the passive member of society.

Band 7 move · Self critique with specifics

“I noticed there were key moments where I seemed to slack off”, naming your own slacking is itself a band 7 move. Compare with “I worked hard on my physicality”.

Band 7 move · Two rounds of feedback, two refinements

Round 1: too one dimensional → fixed by angular arms/neck. Round 2: not enough character contrast → fixed by differentiating advertiser/photographer/princess/passive.

D.6Development, challenge: making the audience think

A significant challenge our group faced was finding ways to make the audience think. During our practices we often got so hung up on trying to make our body language fit the epic theater criterion while also including as many epic theater production techniques as possible that our performance got too overwhelming too quickly. According to our peers, we simply were not giving the audience enough time to really think about what we were trying to convey, meaning we did not convey our statement of inquiry successfully.

So after taking some time to deliberate as a group, we pinpointed key moments in our performance where we would slow down or add alienation. A key moment where we chose to add 3:10, after the princess states that she has flaws. We felt this moment was ideal to add a pause because it makes the audience reflect on their personal flaws while simultaneously making them question why having flaws and being different is seen as such a taboo topic that can remove beauty. Moreover, with further research, we discovered that one of the most successful forms of direct address was through facts or statistics as it reinforced the reality our performance is based on real world issues which is why we also decided to include some statistics as seen at 3:26.

Overall, using epic theater techniques to convey our statement of inquiry, I unearthed the value of theater as not just entertainment but a form of social commentary that requires content that challenges an audience member’s perception of their reality and perhaps inspires them to make a change.

Band 7 move · Diagnosing over stuffing

“too overwhelming too quickly”, the candidate names that the problem was too much Brecht, not too little.

Band 7 move · Specific intervention: the pause

The solution is concrete (a pause at 3:10) AND timestamped AND linked to the SOI (“why having flaws and being different is seen as such a taboo topic that can remove beauty”).