MYP Drama Companion
Grades 9 and 10 · PCUP MYP Drama Companion

Criterion C · Task 3 · max 8 · single strand

Creating

Single strand. Assessed on your final performance. Not the process, not the writing. The examiner watches your 5 minute video and judges the consistency and effectiveness of your skills and techniques.

From the criteria
“The performance is assessed for the skills and techniques demonstrated in the final piece.” Process is not assessed here. That lives in Criterion B.
MYP Arts criterion C

What you are marked on

One strand, one video of about 5 minutes. You are responsible for performance choices (voice, body, space, ensemble) and for the production roles you contributed (sound, set, lighting, costume). The examiner judges both at once and does not separate them.

C

Consistency under pressure is what separates 5 to 6 from 7 to 8

Examiner looks for

A flash of brilliance surrounded by hesitation is not 7 to 8. The examiner watches whether your style holds across transitions, silences, changing characters and the moments when nothing is happening to you on stage.

What the top band looks like on stage
  1. In transitions. You stay in the style of your piece walking from one moment to the next. The audience never sees you stop performing.
  2. When you change characters. The change is choreographed, body and voice shifting cleanly, no fade between them. Visible or hidden is a style decision.
  3. In stillness. When you are not the focus your body is still doing something. Strong ensemble has no resting actor.
  4. In direct contact. Rehearsed eye lines and deliberate pace. You do not rush to fill silences you have asked the audience to sit in.
7 to 8 · Consistently effective

Every choice lands. The performance reads as a series of deliberate decisions and the audience is held in the world of the piece throughout.

What the examiner is watching for, by style

Naturalism

Believable behaviour under stillness. The illusion holds in the small moments: listening, breathing, not quite saying. Heightened reactions break the style.

Epic Theatre / Brecht

Anti illusionist style held throughout. Direct address is extreme proximity to the audience, making the audience think, with variation in tone and intonation. Multi roll switches are visible. Sound and lighting expose rather than create mood.

Expressionism

Externalised inner states. Exaggerated, angular, distorted physicality held across the piece. Slipping into naturalism breaks the style.

Physical theatre

Body as primary text. Shape, lots of negative space and exaggeration. Ensemble breath visibly synchronised. Dialogue, if any, sits inside movement rather than alongside it.

Verbatim

Faithful delivery of real testimony. Mannerisms, pauses, vocal tone and vocal dynamics preserved. The performer disappears behind the source.

Style

Whatever style you have chosen, the examiner asks: is it consistent? A piece that switches style accidentally reads as 3 to 4. A piece that switches deliberately reads as 7 to 8.

The mark bands

1 to 2LimitedSkills are present but inconsistently applied. Techniques are attempted but do not communicate clearly.
3 to 4SatisfactorySkills and techniques are visible. They work some of the time but break down under pressure or in transitions.
5 to 6Mostly effectiveSkills and techniques work consistently across the piece. The audience can read the intent in most moments.
7 to 8Consistently effectiveEvery choice lands. The performance reads as a series of deliberate decisions. The audience is held in the world of the piece throughout.
Loss list

What prevents a performance getting top band

Final checks before the performance

Final checks. Performance readiness, Criterion C.

Real student work

There is no written exemplar for Criterion C

Criterion C is marked on the performance video itself, so there is nothing written to show you. What the 2026 exemplar does give you is everything around it: how that performance was developed in Criterion B and how it was evaluated afterwards in Criterion D.